Anastasia Zakharova vs Ella Seidel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Success: In recent months, Seidel has outperformed Zakharova on second serve points, winning 44.72% compared to Zakharova's 41.39%. Could this provide an advantage? It seems likely given the strong link to match prediction accuracy.
• Return Game Efficiency: Zakharova has excelled in returning first serves, winning 34.2% of points in contrast to Seidel's 30.7%. Yet, Seidel has a slight edge in winning 51.51% of points on opponents' second serve returns compared to Zakharova's 50.51%.
• Resilience Under Pressure: Seidel has shown a slight advantage in saving breakpoints with a 50.29% success rate, which could be crucial in tight moments, whereas Zakharova stands at 48.89%.
• Annual Performance Comparison: Zakharova has triumphed in 61.33% of her matches over the past year, edged out slightly by Seidel's 59.46%. However, in higher-level tournaments, this percentage might reflect differently.
• Surface Preferences: Both players have their best win percentage on indoor hard courts at 69%, but Zakharova fares better on grass than Seidel, indicating potential variance on different surfaces.
• Tournament Level Insights: Within Challenger/ITF > $10K events, Zakharova displays a stronger win record of 69.44% compared to Seidel’s 56.67%.
• Opponent Ranking: Seidel faces slightly higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 217.74 against Zakharova's 230.92, which might indicate tougher competition for Seidel.
• Deciding Set Performance: If the match reaches a deciding set, Seidel seems to have a small superiority, prevailing in 55% of these situations over Zakharova’s 52%.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Zakharova has been more effective at capitalizing on breakpoints recently, converting 42.92% of her opportunities compared to Seidel's 36.4%.

Editorial Prediction (September 14, 2025, UTC):

The comparison of recent performances indicates that while Seidel has a slight edge in second serve success and handling pressure during breakpoints, Zakharova exhibits strengths in breakpoint conversion and first serve returns. This blend of strengths highlights both players' abilities to challenge each other in different facets of the game.

Zakharova's higher win rate in Challenger/ITF tournaments demonstrates her potential to perform well, especially if the match relies heavily on converting opportunities and maintaining momentum. Meanwhile, Seidel's exposure to slightly tougher opponents and better performance in deciding sets may provide her with valuable experience and confidence in critical match phases.

Considering all these factors, the match promises to be competitive. However, the slight advantages in breakpoint conversion and first serve returns might tip the scales in Zakharova's favor. Based on these statistical insights, Zakharova is predicted to have the upper hand in this upcoming match.